<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:07:26 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/"><rss:title>Writing</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><dc:date>2010-07-31T03:07:26Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/10/1/humancraft.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/3/26/spine-a-conversation-with-crumb.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2005/2/21/on-infected-the-lumiere-reader-nz.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/1994/7/20/coil-issue-01-july-1994.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/10/1/humancraft.html"><rss:title>Humancraft</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/10/1/humancraft.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-10-01T11:17:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Category #1</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
The idea that the human is a genetically perfectible artefact is eugenic. There is a tension between the idea of the human body existing in a state of nature, which must be preserved at all costs, and the idea of the body as part of an ongoing technical evolution. The biological possibilities were spectacular, however my concerns were with context, who and what are defining this? 
</div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/3/26/spine-a-conversation-with-crumb.html"><rss:title>Spine - A conversation with CRUMB</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/3/26/spine-a-conversation-with-crumb.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-26T10:38:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
<em>>"these are tiny bodies and from a distance appear  (to me), as if rain."</em>
<br>
<BR>
A critical analysis and discussion around the meanings interpreted from Spine, with members of the CRUMB online forum.
</div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2005/2/21/on-infected-the-lumiere-reader-nz.html"><rss:title>On Infected - The Lumiere Reader, NZ</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2005/2/21/on-infected-the-lumiere-reader-nz.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-02-21T15:29:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
In terms of technological development – which includes what is termed "genetic engineering" – it's not the capabilities or possibilities that are the problem, but the people who control what is developed and how this is used. In other words, the political and socio-economic forces driving research.
</div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/1994/7/20/coil-issue-01-july-1994.html"><rss:title>Coil - issue 01 - July 1994</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/1994/7/20/coil-issue-01-july-1994.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><dc:date>1994-07-20T14:00:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
This  is an extract from a much longer article which was  written as an opening to a 
conference at The London Film Makers Co-op in July 94. It was intended as a broad and 
basic introduction to  issues surrounding digital image manipulation. 
</div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>