<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:00:53 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Writing</title><link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:51:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Humancraft</title><category>Category #1</category><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/10/1/humancraft.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">451269:5159211:5743493</guid><description><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
The idea that the human is a genetically perfectible artefact is eugenic. There is a tension between the idea of the human body existing in a state of nature, which must be preserved at all costs, and the idea of the body as part of an ongoing technical evolution. The biological possibilities were spectacular, however my concerns were with context, who and what are defining this? 
</div>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/rss-comments-entry-5743493.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Spine - A conversation with CRUMB</title><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2006/3/26/spine-a-conversation-with-crumb.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">451269:5159211:5751949</guid><description><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
<em>>"these are tiny bodies and from a distance appear  (to me), as if rain."</em>
<br>
<BR>
A critical analysis and discussion around the meanings interpreted from Spine, with members of the CRUMB online forum.
</div>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/rss-comments-entry-5751949.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>On Infected - The Lumiere Reader, NZ</title><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/2005/2/21/on-infected-the-lumiere-reader-nz.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">451269:5159211:5901526</guid><description><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
In terms of technological development – which includes what is termed "genetic engineering" – it's not the capabilities or possibilities that are the problem, but the people who control what is developed and how this is used. In other words, the political and socio-economic forces driving research.
</div>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/rss-comments-entry-5901526.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Coil - issue 01 - July 1994</title><dc:creator>Gina Czamecki</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1994 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/1994/7/20/coil-issue-01-july-1994.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">451269:5159211:5827624</guid><description><![CDATA[<div style="color: #666666; font-size:12px;">
This  is an extract from a much longer article which was  written as an opening to a 
conference at The London Film Makers Co-op in July 94. It was intended as a broad and 
basic introduction to  issues surrounding digital image manipulation. 
</div>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.ginaczarnecki.com/writing/rss-comments-entry-5827624.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>